=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski wrote: > On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 10:26 +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 04:31:28PM +0000, saq wrote: > > > Author: saq Date: Tue Sep 14 16:31:28 2004 GMT > > > Module: SOURCES Tag: HEAD > > > ---- Log message: > > > - from vendor, fix LD_DEBUG access error (SECURITY) > > > > which "vendor"? > > It looks like the patch is actually written by gentoo, contrary to what > the SecurityTracker advisory said: "The vendor has released a patch > (glibc-sec-hotfix-20040804.patch)"
Did you check whether the problem isn't gentoo-specific ? > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2004-08/msg00059.html > > Besides that, no glibc-related source acknowledges the bug. There's no > fix in glibc CVS either. Ideas? -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
