=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?= wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, havner wrote:
> > >
> > > It is needed as effect of previous changes: dependencies contains epoch.
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > But epoch 0 is default. There is a question though. Does "default" means
> > that %{epoch} is set even if it's not given, or it only means that
> > resulting package has epoch 0? According to this change I assume that
> > second option is correct.
>
> On earlier rpms from AC and current from RA it was not so simple. If epoch
> was not set in package - it was undefined. Epoch=0 was not the same with
> epoch not set at all.
>
> Why qboosh set it on HEAD - dunno. Ask him :)
because this behaviour seems to be still valid: packages with the
"%{epoch}:0.80-4" (literally!) internal deps have been built by builders.
> Anyway - this change is needed on branch and I doubt if it's needed on
> HEAD...
If you kill %{epoch} from deps also - it is not.
--
=======================================================================
Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology
_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
