Dnia 07-01-2005, pią o godzinie 17:34 +0100, Bartosz Taudul napisał(a):
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 06:21:08PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > but perhaps default=yes ? :)
> It's of no use to most people probably. And rpm -qa is IMO fast enough.
> 
> [17:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% time rpm -qa > /dev/null
> rpm -qa > /dev/null  0,33s user 0,16s system 15% cpu 3,200 total
> [17:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]% time rpm -qa > /dev/null
> rpm -qa > /dev/null  0,31s user 0,06s system 99% cpu 0,373 total

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ time rpm -qa > /dev/null
rpm -qa > /dev/null  2,70s user 0,89s system 7% cpu 49,305 total
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ time rpm -qa > /dev/null
rpm -qa > /dev/null  2,68s user 0,84s system 7% cpu 46,982 total

;)

-pawel

-- 
Pawel Zurowski



_______________________________________________
pld-devel-en mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Reply via email to