Jacek Konieczny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-02-2005 15:20]: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 03:04:57PM +0100, Adam Nowotny wrote: >>>>> ---- Log message: >>>>> - added abuse >>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ >>>>> ftpmaster: hostmaster >>>>> admin: hostmaster >>>>> administrator: hostmaster >>>>> +abuse: hostmaster >>>> postmaster is more appropriate for abuse (IMO) >>> or maybe not? abuse@ isn't used only for mail servers now. But... >>>> AFAIK hostmaster is used for DNS-related purposes.
RFC 2142 states: MAILBOX SERVICE SPECIFICATIONS ----------- ---------------- --------------------------- POSTMASTER SMTP [RFC821], [RFC822] HOSTMASTER DNS [RFC1033-RFC1035] USENET NNTP [RFC977] NEWS NNTP Synonym for USENET WEBMASTER HTTP [RFC 2068] WWW HTTP Synonym for WEBMASTER UUCP UUCP [RFC976] FTP FTP [RFC959] >> reverted > But abuse adress IS required!!! I guess the discussion was about where > it should point. IMHO: root or hostmaster (the latter one for coherence with other non-DNS related mailboxes). -- Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpfw6xvRy8Al.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
