On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 01:48:24PM +0100, Michal Moskal wrote: > I ask this because of mono. It by default puts its *.so/*.a/*.la files > where it is told with --libdir. And its OK. However it also installs > /usr/lib/mono directory with .NET libraries (*.dll) and executables > (*.exe). They are architecture independent. However in case you mono --aot > them (for faster loading), you get foo.dll.so in addition to foo.dll, > which clearly *is* architecture dependent. mono-install.patch makes > /usr/lib/mono go to /usr/lib64/mono.
Mono developers accepted this patch, so /usr/lib64/mono will hopefully no longer be PLD-specific[1]. Therefore this configuration is more likely to work with third party packages. > I propose to put mono directory in /usr/lib even on 64 bit systems. So please disregard. [1] I hope that the entire /usr/lib64 thing on amd64 isn't PLD-specific? -- : Michal Moskal :: http://nemerle.org/~malekith/ :: GCS !tv h e>+++ b++ : You can't blame yourself for what gorillas did :: UL++++$ C++ E--- a? _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
