Elan Ruusamäe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [22-02-2005 00:03]:
> On Saturday 19 February 2005 12:44, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
>> I have put some effort to get rid of the apache vs apache1 confusion.
>> ``Provides: %{%{name}_of_another_package}'' in a package with different
>> functionality is a Bad Thing.
> there's similiar issue with php. and it's accepted
> packages have dependancies like
> Requires: php-extensiona >= 4.1.0
> Requires: php-extensionb >= 4.1.0
> and php4 does provide php-extension
Same issue exists with perl (and I have introduced it myself); hovewer,
it's different than the "apache{,1}" one (most important difference: it
doesn't really matter, whether perl-modules or perl-Time-HiRes will be
installed).
Yes, it creates problems -- arising from RPM's crappiness. I don't see
a way for solving this issue without using a chainsaw.
--
Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpLA7i7cSOU5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
