On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 21:23 +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:02:37PM +0200, Elan RuusamÃe wrote: > > what about having separate php(4) packages for apache1 and apache2 > > so i don't need to recompile or otherwise corrupt my system by installing > > accidentally php compiled for other apache version > > > > as of currently php4 means the package for apache > > create php4-apache1 and php4-apache(2) packages > > and Provide: php4 for backwards compatability. > > I'd name them apache1-php4 and apache-php4 > (or maybe apache1-mod_php4 and apache-mod_php4?).
Sounds good to me! > > and question too: does php-common contain symbols for apache? i remember > > error > > that searched some symbol for apache from that library. > > IIRC libphp_common differs depending on used Apache SAPI. Ick. That's horrible. > It should be either reworked or dropped (in favour of duplicating ~1MB > of code 5 times[1] - well, "disks are cheap"?), if php isn't ready for > common code separation. > > [1] cli, cgi, fcgi, apache, apache1 > > But... ugh, I'm not even sure if _PHP modules_ are the same when built > using different Apache SAPIs. > At least thread support option must be the same for all SAPIs(?) Yes. _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
