On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 20:02:48 +0900, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > If you want me to keep this commit and directory then follow up by: > > a) updating rpm macros
Yes, I was considering this point. Just wondering, what would break (in theory: nothing should) and how to perform the validation. Didn't want to do such change without more feedback, so now - if you already summoned this subject, I'll wait a few days for any comments. I've already reviewed these and only one (re)definition needs to be adjusted (in /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/pld), remaining macros seem to be cascading properly. > b) cleaning up packages that have libexec redefined directly in specs > FHS states this directory is optional, and I do not care at all what GNU > shamans think. This is not GNU/PLD, just PLD. I don't care about all this GNU/crap either, but using some Fedora systems this directory was really convenient. My personal rationale is 'follow the world', just to avoid being different than all the rest. -- Tomasz Pala <go...@pld-linux.org> _______________________________________________ pld-devel-pl mailing list pld-devel-pl@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-pl