W liście z pon, 15-12-2003, godz. 16:14, Tomasz Mateja pisze: > Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 03:41:44 +0100 > Received: from gabber.metalab.unc.edu ([152.2.241.57]) > by pimpek.one.pl with smtp (Exim 4.24) > id 1AViee-0004Sj-AE > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 03:40:17 +0100 > Received: (qmail 26685 invoked by uid 1012); 15 Dec 2003 02:40:11 -0000 > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Received: (qmail 26670 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2003 02:40:09 -0000 > Received: from msr97.hinet.net (168.95.4.197) > by gabber.metalab.unc.edu with SMTP; 15 Dec 2003 02:40:09 -0000 > Received: from pcoiybpx (61-216-137-150.HINET-IP.hinet.net > [61.216.137.150]) > by msr97.hinet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA09821; > Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:39:35 +0800 (CST) > Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:39:35 +0800 (CST) > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > FROM: "MS Internet Message Service" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > TO: "Net Recipient" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > SUBJECT: Message: User unknown > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="gcyrryjqgjrpmzi" Nic nowego, ja cały czas dostaje spamy na te konta ;)
__________________________________________________________ nie pytaj co inni zrobili dla pld, pomysl ile sam zrobiles
