Chris Emerson wrote:
>> We're perfectly capable of writing our own script interpeter.  As a
>> matter of fact, that's what we've done up until now..
>
> Why re-invent the wheel?  Surely (assuming a scripting language is
> really necessary) it makes more sense to use something that's already
> out there, to avoid learning and debugging yet another language?
> Python, Tcl, Scheme (rep or guile) and Perl are all possible
> embeddable extension lanaguages, and I'm sure there are loads of
> others.

Yummy flamage ;-)

Whenever I need to do this sort of stuff I usually pull out flex and
bison - get it all running in an hour or two, yet the resulting code
is still fairly bloat-free.  Otherwise I'd probably vote for Python,
which I believe was designed to be imbedded.  Sounds like overkill
to me tho...

- Andrew

--
Andrew Stewart              Cave Rock Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED]     phone +64 3 3664242

Reply via email to