Ramon van Handel wrote:
> But int 0x10 also belongs to the "regular" VGA BIOS... and you can't
> selectively forward interrupts to the host...
>
> Implementing VESA as a real BIOS doesn't sound much more difficult to me than
> implementing it as a plugin... Jeroen, why do you think doing it as a plugin is
> better ?
well, ehmm.. I don't know, that's the first thing that came to mind
really :) I was thinking about only having to write a plugin and expand
plex86 functionality (else you'd allways end up writing guest bios code,
and I don't know if that's allways desirable) + I *think* it's probably
"easier" to debug plugin code then bios code. is that correct?
btw. if I hook int 10h from a plugin and I perform an int 10h in the
guest, will the int 10h handler of the guest also be called, or only the
plugins int 10h hook?
best regards,
Jeroen Janssen
