Thank you for your answer, Steve!
I hope it is a mistake and that this feature comes back, cause it's very
practical!

serge


2013/2/26 Steve McMahon <st...@dcn.org>

> Just chatted with davisagli on #plone and he's going to check to see if
> the static resources change is accidental or intentional.
>
> However, the need to specify grok and relations options is intentional.
> The Framework Team wanted to bring Dexterity into Plone, but didn't want to
> bless grok into core. So, it's an optional, but well-supported, development
> path.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Serge Renfer <serge.ren...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I gave a try to Plone 4.3b2 and tried to install a product I made with
>> Dexterity (ageliaco.rd2), but I couldn't get the static ressource folder to
>> be recognized (as a ressource).
>>
>> I googled around and found only one person talking about that :
>>
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8315422/grok-finding-my-static-folder-in-a-plone-product
>>
>> It comes from a change from five.grok 1.2.0 to 1.3.2, the latest doesn't
>> do what it is advertised it should do : it does not register the "static"
>> folder as it should!
>>
>> Is this a new "feature" of five.grok and it is gonna stay that way, or is
>> it a bug!
>> If it is the first case, then its documentation should be updated to
>> reflect that. Otherwise has someone heard of some new version in
>> preparation?
>>
>> By the way, dexterity seems to have dropped grok in some way (I have to
>> change the required dependencies in setup.py from "dexterity" to "dexterity
>> [grok, relations]".
>> Why is that? Is it to get it lighter (there must be ways to use it
>> without grok, probably TTW? Then it makes sense)
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>> serge
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Product-Developers mailing list
>> product-develop...@lists.plone.org
>> https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Product-Developers mailing list
> product-develop...@lists.plone.org
> https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
>
>
_______________________________________________
Product-Developers mailing list
product-develop...@lists.plone.org
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers

Reply via email to