On Nov 27, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > Thanks for those test results. > > So here is the summary of our combined results so far for pscairo: > > pango 1.14.5 and libcairo 1.2.4 are fine except for tiny text > (Andrew). > > pango 1.16.4 and libcairo 1.4.6 are fine (Alan/32). > > pango 1.18.3 and libcairo 1.4.10 have a major issue (large bits of > the plot > missing) for most of our examples (both Andrew and Alan/64) > > The /32 and /64 in the above summary table indicate whether the > test was run > on 32-bit or 64-bit hardware. Andrew, could you let us know which > of your > above results were 32-bit and which 64-bit? > > Since all other cairo-related drivers are working as well or better > than > before, one possibility is some regression in the PostScript back > end for > libcairo was introduced between libcairo 1.4.6 and 1.4.10. > However, another > possibility is that the PostScript back end or our pscairo device > driver has > a 64-bit issue. > > I am going to build pango 1.16.4 and libcairo 1.4.6 on my 64-bit > machine > to help figure out which hypothesis is correct. > > Hazen and Orion, could you let us know the quality of your pscairo > results > (and your library version numbers as well as whether your hardware > is 32-bit > or 64-bit) as soon as possible?
Intel/32, pango 1.16.5, cairo 1.4.10. Seems fine. PPC/64, pango 1.15.5, cairo 1.2.6. Seems fine. -Hazen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
