On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Andrew Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Hez, > I've commited these changes with just a couple of modifications. Note > that in C source files we use C style comments like /* */ and not > C++ comments like //. Some examples of the latter have crept into the > source, but it is best avoided if possible. There was a time when not > all C compilers supported C++ comments, but I suspect those days are > gone. > > Andrew
Andrew, Thanks for the response and for applying the fix. My apologies on the commenting issue - I will stick to C style comments in the future. Along those lines - should I update the patch I submitted for plimagefr coordinate transforms accordingly? I used C++ // comments for most of my comments in that code. Thank you again for taking the time to review and check this in. Hez > On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 02:35:33PM -0400, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote: > > I ran in to a problem with plcont while translating example 16 to > > OCaml. While writing the OCaml PLplot bindings I mistakenly assumed > > that the plcont function would accept NULL for its pltr and pltr_data > > arguments and fall back on a default transform of some sort. However, > > setting pltr to NULL gave me segmentation faults as plcont uses the > > pltr callback function regardless of its value. -- Hezekiah M. Carty Graduate Research Assistant University of Maryland Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
