Yesterday I posted an announcement (the first such announcement) to  
comp.lang.ada about the official availability of the Ada bindings to  
PLplot. Not too surprisingly (to me), the first response was a  
request to have the "thick" Ada examples displayed on the PLplot home  
page rather than the "traditional" examples. The comp.lang.ada poster  
states, in part,

   "I noticed that all examples mirror the fortranesque C library
   functions more or less directly. (6char names with a "pl"
   prefix making them 8char, tons of numeric parameters...."

I realize that this might be a sensitive subject, so I tread softly.  
I concur with the comp.lang.ada poster but have deferred requesting  
that the thick bindings be displayed out of respect for the PLplot  
tradition. However, I developed the "thick" binding originally and  
added the "traditional" binding at the request of our group of  
developers. In so doing, I have maintained both bindings as co- 
equals. Only a few days ago, Alan added the thick binding examples to  
the test suite and they passed at the same level as the traditional  
binding.

As a still-new Ada programmer (at least compared to some of the gurus  
on ada.comp.lang), I have detected that writing code with clarity is  
a mantra in the Ada community which is the reason that the poster has  
made his request. As far as documentation is concerned, the thick  
binding has comments which are rigorously keyed to the traditional  
PLplot names, making the look-up of names in the documentation very  
easy. I would love to be able to respond to the poster with good news  
while this topic is still current on comp.lang.ada. To my mind,  
presenting potential Ada users of PLplot with a good first experience  
is more important and more likely to create a new PLplot user than  
presenting a consistent style on the PLplot home page--Ada users will  
likely not even look at the other code examples, and if they do, will  
immediately recognize the difference for what it is.

Jerry


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel

Reply via email to