On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:24 PM, David MacMahon <dav...@astro.berkeley.edu> wrote: > I think plparseopts returns -1 (i.e. an error) if PL_MODE_SKIP is > given and the last argument is unknown (i.e. skipped). If the same > command line arguments are reordered such that the last argument is > known (i.e. not skipped), plparseopts will return 0 (i.e. no error). > I think this can be fixed by moving the "status = 0;" line from the > end of the "if ( status == -1 )" block to the beginning of that block > (i.e. before the "if ( mode_skip )" block). Not a high priority, IMHO. >
Dave, Thanks for pointing this out. I have committed your suggested fix as revision 10925. Hez ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
