To get a feel for how popular PLplot is you should go to the file
release area for 5.10.0 and click on the "Downloads/week" statistics
menu item which allows you to change that statistic to any date
range, plot download counts versus time, OS counts for a given time
range, country of origin counts
for a given time range, etc.

I have just done that, and it turns our there are ~8000 downloads of
plplot-5.10.0 since its release 14 months ago.  Binary use of PLplot
on Linux and Mac OS X free software distributions is typically larger
than that download statistic.  Which means our efforts to get out the
next release of plplot-5.11.0 has a very large potential audience.

If you look at OS, Unknown + Linux is 50%, Windows is 43
per cent, Mac OS X is 7%, and the rest round to 0%.  Mentally
assigning Unknown to the Linux OS is probably a pretty safe assumption
since Linux has so many different methods (e.g., wget, curl, sftp, and
different browsers) you can use for downloads, and SF heuristics for
determining OS likely assign Unknown OS to many of those download
methods.  But number 1 versus 2 doesn't really matter; the important
point is both Linux and Windows are very important to us, and I am
glad we have strong contingents of developers who support those
platforms.

The one obvious negative in those download statistics is the relative
small fraction of PLplot users on Mac OS X even though that platform
is used a lot (in my experience) by scientists.  Perhaps binary use
there is a lot higher than download+build use.  But I would feel a lot
better about the Mac OS X situation if, for example, we had
comprehensive testing results for that platform supporting the idea
that PLplot builds are a straightforward experience on that platform.

If you look at country of origin, those downloads occurred for ~100
different countries (or ~60 different countries if you only count
those with more than 10 downloads during the 14 months). China, Japan,
India, Russia, and Korea are in the top 15 countries so I think the
word is beginning to spread that our internationalization capabilities
(i.e., the CTL [complex text layout] capabilities available for our
cairo, qt, and svg device drivers) are working well for those who want
to annotate their plots in their native language script.

Anyhow, these download statistics for 5.10.0 provide a lot of food for
thought and are a nice motivator for me to finish up
the 5.11.0 release!

Alan
__________________________
Alan W. Irwin

Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca).

Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state
implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time
Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting
software package (plplot.sf.net); the libLASi project
(unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net);
and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net).
__________________________

Linux-powered Science
__________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel

Reply via email to