On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Robby Findler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Grant Rettke <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is (log-info-sexpr ...) less boring? >> > > It is such a short macro; do we really need to add 3 more exports to > scheme/base for that?
Look at it this way: you guys, the experts on knowing how to do this "the right way", write it once and add three exports vs. everyone and their brother writing their own variation of it _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
