At some point, I would love to create an experimental language with
typed macros, where Check Syntax didn't actually need to expand the
macros to get binding information because the types would provide that
info.
Thanks,
Dave
On Sep 9, 2009, at 10:56 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
So, I've heard various people saying it would be nice to have a
separate api for check syntax (and presumably the module browser)
pulled out of DrScheme. I definitely agree with that, but I'm
wondering how to prioritize it. Does anyone have some specific use in
mind for the api?
Thanks,
Robby
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
