Matthew, Do you think you can sneak in unsafe-fx-abs and unsafe-fl-abs? It's a pretty common function - at least in the science collection - that I assume would compile nicely. [I promise not to ask for too many of these.]
Doug On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > `inexact-real?' > > At Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:47:35 -0400, Doug Williams wrote: > > Is there an existing contract to check for a float? For example, mean > would > > now be guaranteed to return a float instead of a real. It would be nice > to > > specify this is the contract. > > > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> > wrote: > > > > > At Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:29:01 -0400, Doug Williams wrote: > > > > Are the basic unsafe-fl, unsafe-fx, and unsafe-vector-ref operations > > > > included in 4.2.2? > > > > > > Yes --- except for `unsafe-fx->fl', which is new in 4.2.2.3. > > > > > > >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
