2009/10/19 Grant Rettke <gret...@acm.org>: >> Why not keep it? >> >> There have been no other sorting SRFIs. > > What have people been doing for portable sort?
They use the portable reference implementation of srfi 32. >> And compared to other SRFIs SRFI 32 is high quality. > > How so? Just wondering. Well, it is unfair to point one out, but take a break to read the reference implementation of srfi 32. It is worth while. -- Jens Axel Søgaard _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
