Okay. Robby
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > At Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:28:48 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote: >> In any case, perhaps it's >> best to have some "skip whitespace and comments" function from >> mzscheme to deal with this situation. Matthew: is this difficult to >> get? > > It's awkward. How about having `read-language' (or a variant?) somehow > report where the specification after `#lang' or `#!' started? > Currently, `read-language' implicitly reports the end of the > specification by leaving the port position there; if it seems useful, > we could make that more explicit at the same time. > > > At Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:15:31 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote: >> (Now that I went through that whole story, I think that I've convinced >> myself that using the complete set of sexpr comments is the right >> thing. Even "#;"...) > > That's where I always end up, too. A somewhat more restrictive syntax > would work, but it wouldn't be especially simple. It's easiest to just > use the syntax that we already have, even if it's a bit Scheme-centric. > > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev