On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > Since the vote is split evenly between 1A and 3, I think that 1B is the > right compromise: > > * It keeps `racket' as a REPL plus program launcher. > > * It puts "racket" into the command program's name. > > * It avoids fragile heuristics on filenames versus commands. > > The name `racket-tool' is too long for me, but after aliasing `rt' to > `racket-tool' (and `r' to `racket') in my shell, I expect to be > completely happy with 1B.
We could always go with the long-standing tradition of <lang>c for compilers and call it racketc. --Carl _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
