If the docs refer to PLT the organization, you can leave it. If they refer to PLT as short for PLT Scheme then changing it is the best thing.
I think we should rename schemeunit (but keep a backwards compatibility collection in there). Google suggests that runit is being using for r's unit testing framework, so we could go with rkunit or rktunit or something like that. I propose we DONT vote on this, but the person who does the work or porting it picks the name. :) Robby On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm working on writing my collects and documentation to use and refer > to Racket. I had three questions: > > Are we renaming SchemeUnit? > What about Schelog? (or SLaTeX)? > Lots of docs refer to "PLT", we should change that to "Racket", correct? > > Jay > > -- > Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> > Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University > http://teammccarthy.org/jay > > "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
