I'm curious how it actually happened. On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Carl Eastlund <c...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Matthias Felleisen > <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> >> FUZZZ! How do I get list.rkt back? Stupid git, I want svn back. > > Matthew already fixed it, but... was this really a git problem, or > just a "<user> has not learned git thoroughly yet" problem? Because > those were inevitable. Granted, we're getting a lot more than the cvs > -> svn switch, because svn was designed as a drop-in cvs replacement, > but git was not designed as a drop-in svn replacement. > > --Carl > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev >
-- Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://teammccarthy.org/jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
