On May 25, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote: > On 05/25/2010 09:23 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: >> 2010/5/25 Guillaume Marceau<gmarc...@gmail.com>: >> >>>> but since this is on *meta*stackoverflow, perhaps it requires people >>>> with reputation there instead. (And if this is the case, then it'll >>>> be hard to get upvoted enough.) >>>> >>> Yes, it need reputation points on meta. >>> >>> I wasn't able to vote despite having 71 points on stackoverflow.com >>> >> I got 100 reputation points just by creating a new account. >> This was enough to vote on the ad. If I understand the FAQ correctly >> no more than 15 points is needed. Whether or not it helped that >> I already had points on stackoverflow, I don't know. >> >> > I already had an account on stackoverflow with my google openid and I used > that same id to create an account on meta stackoverflow, but I only started > out with 1 reputation point. They also gave me some made up username of > 'user23842' or something. > > Maybe you were the 1000th user or something?
I also got 100 reputation points. Used the same ID to create the account, saw this banner at the top: "You've associated your Stack Overflow Meta and Stack Overflow accounts: +100 reputation" Was it a Google OpenID? John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-dev
