At Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:46:24 -0500, Dave Herman wrote: > The read behavior of #hash/#hasheq and #s is different; the former > always `quote' their body whereas the latter allows quasiquotation: > > > (define x 42) > > `#hash((x . ,x)) > #hash((x . ,x)) > > `#hasheq((x . ,x)) > #hasheq((x . ,x)) > > `#s(x ,x) > #s(x 42) > > I don't know if it's too late for an incompatible change, but allowing > quasiquotation of #hash/#hasheq seems more useful, no?
Unquote for the value part of a `#hash' could work. I'm less sure that it's a good idea for the key position, since the reader constructs a hash table. Aside from the possible constraint on keys, it's not so much a reader issue as a question of what the `quasiquote' macro recognizes. The source of `quasiquote' is "collects/scheme/qq-and-or.ss".
