Jon Rafkind skrev: > > (define (+1 x) x) > readline::57: define: bad syntax (not an identifier for procedure name, > and not a nested procedure form) at: 1 in: (define (1 x) x) > > > (define (-1 x) x) > readline::75: define: bad syntax (not an identifier for procedure name, > and not a nested procedure form) at: -1 in: (define (-1 x) x) > > I guess +1 and -1 are parsed as numbers, which aren't included as > identifiers. Is this fixable?
You could use |+1| but pretty it isn't. -- Jens Axel S?gaard
