> I'm not sure exactly what VFS support would require, but maybe I'll
> take a look. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't going to duplicate
> development effort (i.e., develop a patch just in time to see that
> someone else developed a better one. ;)
Welcome to open source =)
Seriously though, I'll be poking around in this code again very
soon, to see if I can get some of the "foreign" features working, vfs, et
al., since one of my other projects (PODS and pilot-link) will be getting
an infusion of vfs/SD/MD support soon.
No promises on my calendar though...
/d
