> On Tue, Nov 06, 2001, Bill Janssen wrote: > > Another thought I had was to use function code 0x1B instead of 0x53, > > That would not be according to the spec. which says that the function > code's least significant 3 bits represent the remaining function code > length; the most significant 5 bits represent the function code. > > /Mike
Yes, you're right. Bill
