-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> Frankly, I never figured anyone would ever put owner_id_build in a > configuration file, but would only use it from the command-line. I forgot > just how paranoid a lot of folks out there are. I notice the latest Python distiller still uses owner_id_build in Writer.py. Is that what we're sticking with for the config files syntax now? I only ask because I have to parse that config file, and I need to know what the Python version is passing in. Locally, I'm using owner_id in the config and owner-id as an argument to the spider, but the Python one differs. Just let me know what you want to use, I'll use it for your tool. d. perldoc -qa.j | perl -lpe '($_)=m("(.*)")' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.1.92 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9jI9BkRQERnB1rkoRAp2mAKDTJwNZgokg0FIDL+ZDLhkwOCSQkQCff4Az yBAYN7zunwFjxzHCtTSuaCU= =rjNW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev