>Probably the same is true for explode? >Bill Haven't tried it for explode. If you are going to add in my project files, I've attached updates. I neglected to look at what you were defining for the compiler in the make file. How come unpluck needs a define to the directory plucker is in? It's okay when you are building the source yourself, but it's not going to work too well if I need to distribute it.
I've got the gtk viewer building again, but it seems to have some problems. Do I have to have the ini file in the directory that the pdb was produced from? Should I be able to open the PluckerUserGuide when I don't have any of the files that were used to build it? Also, the file/path dialog doesn't seem to do anything. I was thinking there would be a button to open a new file with or something. This is using an early October cvs date snapshot. I'll keep banging at it to see what's going on. Bill (See attached file: unpluck.dsp)(See attached file: unpluck.dsw)
unpluck.dsp
Description: Binary data
unpluck.dsw
Description: Binary data
