Yeah, I was referring to the text classes, perhaps I should have called it GenericTextParser :). ImageParser would continue to be called in the same way as it currently is. Although you could do a similar GenericImageParser class and split these based on tool.
I'm not sure there would be much advantage in creating a generic parser class to cover text and images. On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 22:39, Bill Janssen wrote: > Dave, > > I like the general idea. I think that getting the GenericParser class > right might be a bit tricky, but worth trying. Isn't it really about > text classes, though? There's a similar scheme in ImageParser for > image types, though there the separator is the image manipulation > tool, rather than the image type! > > Bill > > _______________________________________________ > plucker-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev -- Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
