On Fri, May 30, 2003, Adam McDaniel wrote: > Yep. Its true. :) v20030222-am contained a workaround to this problem > but it was deemed a 'bad hack' and was never commited to CVS.
True, but I didn't call it a "bad hack"; I only said that your were trying to fix the symptom instead of the problem ;-) > The problem arises from using an ErrTry/ErrCatch sequence that exceeds > the maximum depth allowed. So you say, but so far you haven't been able to actually provide any "evidence" ;-) > The here's a diff to the workaround I used.. but I wanted to find > something more prestine. As I said already in February, if you want to do something about this you have to find the problem instead of trying to "patch away" the symptom. I won't allow that kind of "fixes" ;-) /Mike _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
