Actually as I am looking at your screenshots it looks to me like you did more than just use the slimmed down pdb file I sent you. You took the time to actually download and use the lds-get program. Is this correct?

Yep, I'm pedantic like that ;) I try to go the extra mile or two in everything I do, especially if it is something that affects Plucker users.


So what did you think? Was it simple enough to use? The downloading is a little slow, urllib2 seems to be a lot slower than using httplib. But these are minor things I can fix when I get a chance.

It looks pretty good. I'd make a few suggestions for the next version (if you intend on actually making another version):


        - Something like request.add_header('Accept-encoding', 'gzip')

        - In the config, narrow down the params, so you can do
          someting like:

                SourcePath  = "/tmp/lds-get"

                OutputPath  = $SourcePath
                LayoutsPath = $SourcePath/layouts"
                FilemapPath = $SourcePath/src/filemap.txt"

                ..or whatever Python uses to do this. This way, the
                user only has to modify two locations: 1.) where
                lds-get is unpacked, and 2.) where they want the final
                output to end up.

        - Add a custom title page for each section. I was almost going
          to do this, but figured it wasn't worth it for this quick
          screenshot pass.

        - Instead of writing the "raw" data to OutputPath, and then
          referencing that over to lds.org_clean, how about writing
          everything to OutputPath/temp and then the final copies to
          OutputPath/lds.org?

        But from what I see, it looks really good. Keep up the work!


David A. Desrosiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gnu-designs.com _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list

Reply via email to