On Mon, Oct 04, 2004, David A. Desrosiers wrote: > I'm not clear on how this would be implemented, but doing a per-record > comparison of compressed vs. uncompressed records, and storing only > the smaller of the two, would decrease the final .pdb size quite a bit
It already works that way. Actually, it is a requirement in the Plucker format for the length of the compressed data to be less than its uncompressed length. /Mike _______________________________________________ plucker-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-list
