At my work, there is definitely not a Linux/technology slant. Here's a sample of one week's traffic on our busiest site:
IE: 118,289 (69.25%) FF: 26,316 (15.41%) Safari: 20,086 (11.76%) Chrome: 5,064 (2.96%) Windows: 146,449 (85.73%) Mac: 22,247 (13.02%) Android: 655 (0.38%) iPhone: 551 (0.32%) Linux: 298 (0.17%) IE is definitely loosing market share, but Windows is holding strong. On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Craig White <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 02:16 -0700, Michael J. Ryan wrote: > > If the site in question is a technology site or a linux site, and by > nature of > > posting here, I would think it well could be... the results will be > skewed a > > bit. I really wish Google, ms, and yahoo would all publish their web > stats. > > Would be a much better benchmark for who's using what... Also, less than > 500 > > visits isn't a broad enough sample to even break the margin of error > here. > ---- > very much NOT technology web site > > yes, less than 500 visits isn't broad enough to broach any margins of > error but it is all that I have in 8 days (which I think is actually > doing pretty good considering that 81% of my traffic is from Google > searches) and the web site hasn't been online for a month yet. FWIW, > according to GA, I crossed the 500 visits threshold yesterday. > > What I have seen is that web stats vary greatly depending upon who is > doing the data collection and my thinking is that so far, my results are > tracking pretty much in line with w3schools.com which definitely shows > that IE (all versions) is very much on the decline. > > Also, I'm gathering that there was a fair amount of pent-up demand for a > smart phone alternative to AT&T/iPhone and the Android has apparently > been the one to fill the void (not the Palm Pre and definitely not > Blackberry). > > so yeah, the stats probably don't mean much but they were surprising to > me and gives me good hope for things Linux and various open source > alternatives (FF, Safari, Android). > > Craig > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > PLUG-devel mailing list - [email protected] > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-devel >
_______________________________________________ PLUG-devel mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-devel
