On 2021-08-04 13:25, Brian Cluff via PLUG-discuss wrote:
Please keep the conversion roughly on topic of Linux and the topics
surrounding Linux such as computers, software.

Pretty much this.

Moving to 64-bit time_t took care of the 2038 problem. However, I have no doubt that some userspace date libraries will still have problems with 5-digit years, and those problems will be ignored until roughly 9995.

https://aeon.co/essays/when-time-became-regular-and-universal-it-changed-history makes an interesting case for considering a calendar as a technology. tl;dr: Moving from "Year 12 of the reign of Alexander I" to "Year 123 of the Seleucid Era" changed everything. The year number just keeps going up?[0] It's possible to confidently refer to a date in the future? Every place in the empire uses the same date? We take it for granted, but the ancient world was like, "Mind... blown!"

[0] Historians of the late Roman republic and early empire sometimes referred to dates "since the founding of the city" but consular and later regnal years were much more common.

--
Crow202 Blog: http://crow202.org/wordpress
There is no Darkness in Eternity
But only Light too dim for us to see.
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Reply via email to