> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Andrew "Tuna" Harris wrote: >> - Nobody with the company that produces the proprietary software >> may say the word "plinth" out in public.
This would also be interesting. But would it be enforceable? ISTR that there are plenty of problems with unenforceable contracts, and a judge who didn't like you or hadn't been paid off might use that as a means to declare the license invalid. Then again, IANAL. From: Alex Dean <a...@crackpot.org> > "It is alleged that, on April 1 2015, Defendant did knowingly and with > malice aforethought duplicate software programs and code licensed by > Plaintiff, and did expressly failed to comply with Subsection 3.2.15 > (Chicken Dance), commonly referred to as the 'Dancing Clause'. > Plaintiff seeks relief in the immediate performance of said Dance by > Defendant." Then it'd be available in the public record. Neat. I wonder how much silliness would happen if, say, the next release of libtiff was only available under the Chicken Dance License. -- Matt G / Dances With Crows The Crow202 Blog: http://crow202.org/wordpress/ There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
