On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 12:24:36AM +0530, Mandar Vaze / ????? ??? wrote: > > appears a yesteryears' favorite now with mere 4.8% share. (I use mutt and > > feel like an endangered species... danger of being driven away to some > > corner of an archaeological museum, with no idea about my wrongdoing.) > > > > In case of techie - wrongdoing could be "not moving with times"
More than time, it's just a preference divide. When I chose mutt, thunderbird, kmail, evolution, webmail all existed and I tried nearly all of them as well. Switching to mutt was a choice rather than old habit, which I have never resented. I definitely keep my setup evolving, where keeping with times means looking for better and better ways to manage the ever exploding information, reducing manual intervention to minimum possible level. For me, mutt (or for that matter a no of text applications) are a _platform_ rather than an application, on which I can build my own application fairly quickly. I don't insist this to suit everyone. It's a subjective matter and hence not a flame war. Mayuresh. _______________________________________ Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List
