well , in my own opinion , i see Redhat as a Server and Linux Mandrake as
a Workstation ;)
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Raymond wrote:
> they are just the same. i mean, there are no difference on how you
> configured those services in redhat and doing the same in a mandrake
> distro. i just feel that with regards to hardware detection, mandrake is
> better than redhat.
>
> At 01:49 PM 5/26/00 +0800, you wrote:
> >if mandrake is better...i have a question? if your using redhat for your dns
> >server, mail server, and gateway, how would you migrate all that to
> >mandrake? would it be a problem? hmmmm tough one for newbies like me...
>
--
m i c h a e l v i n c e n t p o z o n
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ::
---------------------------------------------------------------
HPS Software & Communication Corp. ICQ : 1413343
Pilipino Internet Cebu office : (+63)(32) 3447847
Systems/Network Administrator home : (+63)(32) 3446427
CCNA,CCDA - - - - - - - - - - - - cell : (+63) 917-3276966
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://mikevince.tripod.com
-
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [plug] Fw: [expert] GET READY FOR A DISCUSSION
Michael Vincent K. Pozon - CompE Fri, 26 May 2000 00:13:57 -0700
- [plug] Fw: [expert] GET READY FOR A DISCU... Edwin Linux Fan
- RE: [plug] Fw: [expert] GET READY FO... Efren L Fernandez II
- [plug] Fw: [expert] GET READY FO... Raymond
- Re: [plug] Fw: [expert] GET ... Michael Vincent K. Pozon - CompE
- Re: [plug] Fw: [expert] ... Federico Sevilla III
