i think lo means linked object and so means shared object. correct me if i'm wrong.
On 6/21/06, Geruel M. Casibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks a lot guys, sorry for the last reply, I take a day off for 2 days. There is no error in the compilation. The "make" command was successful. I was only wondering why in the guides I have followed, it supposed to create the files mod_jk.so or mod_jk2.so, instead I got mod_jk2.la, mod_jk2.lo and mod_jk2.o Anyway, it is working since last Sunday. I just downloaded the Fedora Core 1 binary that is available in the website and it seems it is compatible with my CEntOS4.3. The Java port and Test pages works. Are there an issue here in terms of security since it has already no support? May bayad po =) ----------------------------- Try Resin: http://www.caucho.com/ ----------------------------- Thank you. Geruel ----- Original Message ----- From: Roger Filomeno To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 1:45 PM Subject: Re: [plug] Apache + Tomcat + mod_jk2.so [Scanned] Try Resin: http://www.caucho.com/ On 6/19/06, Warlin Pantoja < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Geruel, > > Why do you need to compile your jk connector? As much as possible you must > use the binaries. Is the linux jk connector not compatible with CentOS? > > In any case, you should NOT be using the jk2 connector since it still has > many problems but support for it has lessened. As Jeff suggested, if you are > interested in the jk2 implementation over the previous jk versions, it is > better to use mod_proxy. > > And what were the errors in compiling the jk connectors? Surely if it were > not able to create the mod_jk so files, the logs would have recorded the > problem. These logs might give you a clue as to what happened. > > Hope that helps. > > > Lange > > ________________________________________ > From: Geruel M. Casibu [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 10:51 AM > To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List > Subject: [plug] Apache + Tomcat + mod_jk2.so [Scanned] > > Hi, > > I need help in Integrating Tomcat and Apache on CentOS 4.3.I have been able > to make tomcat works but I cant integrate it with apache since I cant figure > out why I cant make the modules mod_jk.so and mod_jk2.so build. > > I have tried so many guides and here are some of those I reallyfind so > helpful. > > http://www.linuxmine.com/23.html > http://www.ozibug.com/doc/howto/apache-integration-howto.html#compile > http://penguincares.no-ip.org:9090/mylinuxtips/?p=241 > http://bbs.chinaunix.net/archiver/?tid-505142.html > http://edu.51cto.com/html/2005/0901/2285.htm > http://www.pixelfreak.net/howto/apache2_jk2_tomcat/socket.html > > > Even then, after issuing this commands, > tar zxvf jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src.tar.gz > cd jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src/ > cd jk/native2 > #make clean > ./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs > make > cd ../build/jk2/apache2/ > cp mod_jk2.so /usr/local/apache2/modules/ --> (This is not possible anymore) > > Since all my ../build/jk2/apache2/ folder contents are > ________________________________________ > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 752 Jun 18 08:35 mod_jk2.la > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 326 Jun 18 08:35 mod_jk2.lo > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52812 Jun 18 08:35 mod_jk2.o > ________________________________________ > > What am I going to do with it? > > How do I make the mod_jk2.so? > TIA, > > > Geruel > > > > > ________________________________________ > I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. > It has removed 6135 spam emails to date. > Paying users do not have this message in their emails. > Try SPAMfighter for free now! > > > ________________________________________________
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
