tis should have read "software IS A substantial part..."
but then again, i don't think that software is not a substantial part
On 2/6/07, Percy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hello aneurin, (: yep, that's what i meant precisely. and i wont mind paying for an open-source version, as long as it's stable enough. but then again, i don't think that software is not a substantial part of their (multi-fx manufacturers) bread and butter. it is the multi-effects that's making the bucks. looking at a different point of view, perhaps these manufacturers wont give a damn creating an open-source version of their software since its not their core business anyway - additional cost lang siguro sa kanila yun. oh well... if i only had a mac (ack!) :D P On 2/6/07, ramfree17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip> > > for commercial companies, creating opensource software for their gear might go against their business model especially if that software is part of their bread and butter. i think you meant they should (hopefully) create versions of their software that would run natively in Linux/BSD/* instead of just in Windows. :) > > ciao! > > -- > "Programming, an artform that fights back" > > Anuerin G. Diaz > Registered Linux User #246176 > Friendly Linux Board @ http://mandrivausers.org/index.php > http://capsule.ramfree17.org , when you absolutely have nothing else better to do > > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph >
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
