On 8/22/07, jan gestre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/22/07, Michael Tinsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Are these IP networks in the same physical LAN structure? If so, you
> > don't need IPSec, just a router.
> >
>
> networks A and B are co-located remotely together with the gateway while
> network C is the H.O., actually VPN is already setup using site2site VPN
> of sonicwall firewall but the current setup doesn`t allow servers from
> network A, B and C to directly communicate, it still has to pass via
> gateway, is it possible to create a VPN between the three network mentioned?
>
>
>
> i'm updating the network information because i only got hold of the real
diagram this morning:
server A 10.10.10.2/24 ------------------|
|
|--------firewall
-->VPN VPN <------ firewall --- HO server C 192.168.1.2/24
|
server B 10.11.12.2/24 ------------------|
10.10.10.3/24 |
|
|
|--------cisco router
10.11.12.0/24
pardon me for my drawing, anyways we have an existing VPN that connects
server C to the remote office server A however we can't connect directly to
server B without passing thru server A because all traffic on servers that
have dual ip's goes to the cisco router, we don't have control over the
cisco so is it possible to route traffic of server B to the firewall instead
of the cisco router for us to achieve what we want?
--
http://jangestre.wordpress.com
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
