A bit OT. Two years ago I compared Linux, DragonFlyBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD and QNX nanosleep() accuracy [1]. I'm not sure if there are any significant improvements with Linux nanosleep(). I didn't use real time patches on Linux because I wanted to test bare kernels.
<http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~ed/misc/nanosleep/> On 9/26/07, Pablo Manalastas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And nobody cares... > > http://www.qnx.com/news/pr_2471_1.html > > QNX is a real-time OS, unlike Linux. So you can use it > to monitor patients in a hospital, monitor laboratory > experiments, view true real-time video playback, etc > -- stuff that Linux can't do well enough. It is a > nice thing that QNX is now open-source. > > PManalastas > > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > plug@lists.linux.org.ph (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List plug@lists.linux.org.ph (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
