On Feb 7, 2008 4:02 PM, Zak B. Elep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 7, 2008 3:50 PM, Ronald Allan Tomimbang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > this scenario has taken form in almost all areas of systems > > administration....its the help that counts and people who share there > > success stories. irregardless of preference and i believe qmail or postfix > > has its strengths and weakness...again its what the software is being > > targeted for use. > > I hate to be the Grammar Nazi, but it should be `regardless'. :P > > Anyways, sendmail is still alive and used, despite being a potentail > weakest link in the system security chain, so if there is more info > out there that's passed around to make it much more bearable, then > that ought to be good. >
In short, everyone's entitled to his own poison. ;) But information-sharing is always good -- it's how we use it that matters. -- Ian Dexter R. Marquez http://feeds.iandexter.net/Coredump _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
