Open XML - not open, and definitely broken XML implementation. If this is acceptable as an ISO standard, then ISO has sunk to new low depths, and MS really defines FUD to a new low, way more devious than IBM did FUD
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Rommel Feria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes! Bwahahaha! > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Rage Callao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Open standards... you mean like OOXML? > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Rommel Feria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think the preference should be OPEN STANDARDS instead of mandating > > > that everything should be OPEN SOURCE. > > > > -- > > Rage Callao > > Free Software :: empower :: educate :: liberate > > _________________________________________________ > > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > > > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
