On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Ariz Jacinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FTBP: http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/blog/devel/other/2008_09_21.html
>
> "[...]Also added couple of jokes about conspiracy theories (like bug fires
> because Intel forces us to buy a new adapter by this error) to make it a
> little bit more flameable and to bring attention. I really hope Intel does
> not do it intentionally. "

Reading the LKML,[0] it look like mjg59's got the right solution[1]
(as usual:) try to really fix the code rather than making a lot of
noise about it.  I do understand Evgeniy's side though (4 years
sitting on such a situation would probably get to anyone's nerves,
especially when said device is fast becoming obsolete.)

[0]  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/21/51
[1]  http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/21/164

-- 
Zak B. Elep || http://zakame.spunge.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to