Is there are possible market state where Oracle will zero the license-to-use price and only charge for support?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Orlando Andico <orly.and...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sun actually positions MySQL as an Oracle replacement in some cases, > and you ought to check out their support contract pricing.. the > comparison is more relevant than you guys think. > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:12 PM, joebert jacaba <joebe...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think its unfair to compare Oracle 10 or 11g to Postgres. There are >>> a lot of verticals that Oracle cover that Postgres probably doesn't >>> because of market demand. A more appropriate comparison would probably >>> be OracleXE to PostgreSQL. >>> >> >> And is it fair to compare it to MySQL? > > > > -- > Orlando Andico > +63.2.976.8659 | +63.920.903.0335 > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
