Agreed, Both have their place. To the original article. In summary, CLI is good for automation. GUI falls flat. Article IT publication is needed to tell me that? Subtle "Cherry Picking" of premises to support CLI is glorious.
Much easier to configure small changes(2 minutes) in QoS via iptables and restrictions in my tomatousb router in the GUI rather than doing it in CLI. See? I'm doing selective bias as well! :) regards, Andre | http://www.varon.ca On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Michael Janapin <[email protected]>wrote: > I tried both using GUI and CLI as an admin. > Both have their ups and downs. And I think just like any other tool, its > usefulness rests on the hand of the user (fat fingers included, lol). > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:53 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote: > >> A mite harsh. "Why GUIs *can* suck" is more like it. Why GUIs suck, >> revisited <http://shar.es/3MSo8> >> Source: infoworld.com >> >> Still think that GUIs rule on IT gear? You're so wrong. As proof, a tale >> of woe that contrasts the GUI and command-line approaches >> <http://shar.es/3MSo8> [email protected] sent this using >> ShareThis<http://sharethis.com>. >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List >> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug >> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph >> > > > > -- > Michael R. Janapin > PBTS Baguio City, Philippines > http://mulingsilang.wordpress.com > http://www.pbts.net.ph > > > > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph >
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
